Portrait photo of Professor Nicola Mackintosh, in front of a shelf filled with...
Professor Nicola Mackintosh

Image source: University of Leicester 

News • Implementation assessment

Patient safety: Can “Martha's Rule” save lives?

Leicester researchers are among those conducting a major study to investigate how a patient safety rule introduced to ensure patients and their families are heard is making a difference.

The three-year national research programme is being funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). 

Martha’s Rule is an initiative introduced following the teenager’s death at King’s College Hospital in 2021. 

Portrait photo of Martha Mills
Martha Mills

It is named in memory of Martha Mills, who died after a failure to escalate her care led to her death from sepsis

The rule is designed to give patients and families the opportunity to report daily how they are feeling and if their condition has changed, and to seek an urgent review from an independent team if they have concerns about a patient’s worsening condition. It is currently being put in place by all NHS Trusts across England following a pilot phase across dozens of hospitals. 

Now, a major review is being launched to investigate how well the rule is being implemented and where improvements could be made. It brings together leading patient safety researchers, clinicians, patients and public contributors to examine how Martha’s Rule is working in practice. 

The national evaluation is being led by the NIHR Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC) and delivered by SafetyNet, through a collaboration between all six NIHR PSRCs which carry out research to improve patient safety across England. 

The three-year research programme brings together expertise from across the network under the leadership of Professor Ramani Moonesinghe and John Welch, both consultants at University College London Hospitals (UCLH) and leaders within the NIHR Central London PSRC. 

Martha's Rule has the potential to strengthen patient safety by ensuring that patients and families have a clear route to raise concerns when a patient's condition is deteriorating

Darren Ashcroft

The NIHR Greater Manchester PSRC, alongside researchers from the universities of Leicester and Manchester, will play a key role on the qualitative and health economic workstreams of the Martha’s Rule evaluation, including how patients, families and staff are supported and empowered to speak up for safety and raise concerns about care. 

The qualitative workstream of the evaluation will be co-led by Professor Nicola Mackintosh with support from Dr Liz Sutton, from the University of Leicester’s Division of Public Health and Epidemiology. Together they have a portfolio of related work conducted over the past 10 years in patient and family involvement in safety, and in the design of safety tools to enable the rescue of deteriorating patients on hospital wards. 

Professor Mackintosh said: “We know that patients and family members can play a central role in contributing to timely management of deterioration. Martha’s Rule offers a way for their voices to be routinely heard. The qualitative workstream will enable us to understand how Martha’s Rule is being implemented across different settings, its influence on local cultures of safety, and factors that shape equitable provision of Martha’s Rule for all.” 

The Martha’s Rule evaluation also draws on health economics expertise from the NIHR Greater Manchester PSRC team, led by Professor Rachel Elliott and Dr Thomas Allen from The University of Manchester. The evaluation will help determine the cost implications and economic benefits for hospitals implementing Martha’s rule. 

Professor Darren Ashcroft, Director of the NIHR Greater Manchester PSRC, said: "Martha's Rule has the potential to strengthen patient safety by ensuring that patients and families have a clear route to raise concerns when a patient's condition is deteriorating. This evaluation is an important opportunity to understand how the policy is being implemented in practice, what works well, and where further improvements may be needed. By drawing on our expertise in qualitative research and health economics, we are delighted to contribute to this important national study and help build the evidence needed to support safer care for patients and families." 

Concerns raised by Merope Mills, the mother of Martha, over her daughter's hospital care at the time were not listened to and a coroner later ruled that Martha would probably have survived if she had been transferred earlier to intensive care and given appropriate treatment. 


Source: University of Leicester 

16.08.2026

Related articles

Photo

News •

Does a hospital stay set patients up for sepsis by disrupting the microbiome?

Can a routine hospital stay upset the balance of microbes in our bodies so much that it sets some older people up for a life-threatening health crisis called sepsis? A new University of Michigan and…

Photo

News • Lung cancer CT notification

Breast cancer: Keep CALM – and coordinate your screenings

Many women over 50 schedule mammograms for breast cancer but miss out on CT lung cancer screenings they're also eligible for. Targeted outreach coul help change this, a new study shows.

Photo

News • Predicting bloodstream infections

AI to tackle antimicrobial resistance, sepsis, in the ICU

UK scientists are harnessing the power of AI to assess the antimicrobial resistance of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and identify sepsis-causing bloodstream infections.

Subscribe to Newsletter