Lead author Professor Chamindie Punyadeera
Lead author Professor Chamindie Punyadeera

Image source: Griffith University 

News • Non-invasive testing

Early diagnosis of lung cancer from breath samples

The human breath could help identify cancerous lung nodules negating the need for invasive testing.

New Griffith University research, funded by Tour de Cure, analysed exhaled breath to help doctors distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous lung nodules, supporting earlier lung cancer diagnosis. Approximately 2.5 million new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed each year. 

Professor Chamindie Punyadeera from Griffith’s Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics said the study evaluated two complementary technologies, with both showing promise. “We studied an electronic nose, or eNose, which identifies patterns in breath chemicals,” Professor Punyadeera said. “The second technology was gas chromatography-mass spectrometry which identified specific volatile organic compounds in breath. Both breath-based approaches showed substantially better discrimination between malignant and benign nodules than models using standard clinical information alone.” 

The study has been published in MedComm. 

While a simple breath test is showing promise in identifying which nodules are most likely to be malignant, it is not intended to replace biopsies, but rather to help clinicians decide who needs invasive intervention most urgently

Xi Zhang

The research could replace the need for invasive testing which currently entailed a CT-guided lung biopsy to obtain tissue for a diagnosis. Other invasive techniques encompassed a bronchoscopy to sample suspicious nodules, or in some cases, surgery to remove or investigate nodules that may be cancerous. 

Sometimes patients underwent invasive techniques to later find out 95% of pulmonary nodules identified on low-dose CT scans were ultimately found to be non-cancerous. 

Co-author Dr Xi Zhang said: “Biopsying lung nodules can be technically challenging, particularly when lesions are small or difficult to access, and can cause complications such as pneumothorax or collapsed lung. While a simple breath test is showing promise in identifying which nodules are most likely to be malignant, it is not intended to replace biopsies, but rather to help clinicians decide who needs invasive intervention most urgently. It is hoped it could also potentially reduce unnecessary procedures for patients with benign nodules by including the non-invasive test into routine clinical care.” 

Recommended article

Photo

Article • Breath analysis to aid diagnoses

Breathomics: far more than hot air

In diagnostics, it sometimes makes sense to follow your nose. During the Labmed Forum at Medica, Dr Beniam Ghebremedhin and Dr Simona Cristescu discussed the diagnostic potential of breathomics – the analysis of a patient’s exhaled air for disease indicators.

This research was conducted by PhD student Waqar Ahmed Afridi. Professor Punyadeera and Dr Zhang worked in collaboration with Adjunct Associate Professor David Fielding, a staff thoracic physician at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, who provided clinical guidance and leadership throughout the research, was critical to the paper’s translation relevance. This research was undertaken in collaboration with Dr David Paas from Queensland Health. 


Source: Griffith University 

29.09.2026

Related articles

Photo

News • Unexpected weight loss

Blood test trends may help identify increased risk of cancer

Monitoring blood test trends alongside unexplained weight loss can provide further clues about a patient’s risk of developing cancer, according to a new study.

Photo

News • Urologie

Urine test detects 9 in 10 bladder cancers in NHS study

A non-invasive urine test detected more than 9 in 10 bladder cancers in a large NHS study – and could reduce urgent cystoscopies significantly.

Photo

News • Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy

New technique could aid targeted lung cancer treatment

Detecting genetic mutations associated with lung cancer via laboratory tests can be expensive and time-consuming, and use up valuable tissue from small biopsy samples. A new approach aims to fix this.

Subscribe to Newsletter