© OB production – stock.adobe.com

News • Successful clinical validation

Urine-based test detects aggressive prostate cancer

The test can differentiate between various grades of cancer, helping men avoid unnecessary biopsies

Traditional approaches to prostate cancer screening involve blood tests, MRI, and biopsies. However, in addition to being uncomfortable, some of these procedures result in overdiagnosis of low-grade cancers. 

In a new study published in the Journal of Urology, researchers at the University of Michigan Health Rogel Cancer Center have clinically validated a previously developed urine test, which can potentially bypass these invasive procedures among men who are unlikely to benefit.

[MPS2's] primary benefit is that the test can accurately predict your probability of developing aggressive prostate cancer, putting both the patient and physician at ease

Ganesh Palapattu

Prostate cancers are categorized based on their Gleason Grade or Grade Group. Those with Gleason 3+4=7, or Grade Group 2, or higher are more likely to grow and cause harm in comparison with Gleason 6 or Grade Group 1 prostate cancers, which are considered non-aggressive. 

The urine test, called MyProstateScore 2.0, or MPS2, looks at 18 different genes linked to high-grade prostate cancer. The researchers had previously demonstrated that the test was effective in identifying GG2 or higher cancers, helping patients avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, in that study, urine samples were obtained after a digital rectal examination. “The process requires the prostate to be compressed, causing the release of cellular debris into a urine sample that the patient provides after the rectal exam,” said Ganesh S. Palapattu, M.D., a professor of urology. Such an examination may not be practical for many and is associated with some discomfort. 

In the study, the team modified the urine collection approach so that the MPS2 test could detect markers for prostate cancer, without requiring a prior rectal exam. Using urine samples from a cohort of 266 men who did not undergo a rectal exam, they found that the test could detect 94% of GG2 or higher cancers and was more sensitive than blood tests. 

Recommended article

Photo

Article • Research, diagnostics, therapy

Focus on prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is not only one of the most common, but also one of the deadliest types of cancer in men. Diagnostics are correspondingly sophisticated, from imaging via ultrasound or MRI to various biopsy techniques – often even in combination. Keep reading for current developments in early detection, staging, therapy and research.

Further, the team used mathematical models to demonstrate that the use of MPS2 would have avoided up to 53% of unnecessary biopsies. “These results show that MPS2 has promise as an at-home test,” Palapattu said. “Its primary benefit is that the test can accurately predict your probability of developing aggressive prostate cancer, putting both the patient and physician at ease." 

MPS2 can also help patients save on healthcare costs since it is significantly cheaper than an MRI. 

The team is interested in repeating the study and corroborating their results with a larger, diverse population of men. They're also hoping to study the test’s performance in men as a surveillance screen for low-risk prostate cancer. “MPS2 could potentially improve the health of our patients by avoiding overdiagnosis and overtreatment and allowing us to focus on those who are most likely to have aggressive cancers,” Palapattu said. 


Source: Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan; author: Ananya Sen

29.01.2025

Related articles

Photo

News • Comparison study

Prostate cancer screening on par with breast cancer screening

Prostate cancer screening compares favourably to screening for breast cancer in identifying significant cancers, reducing mortality and avoiding unnecessary harms, says new research.

Photo

News • Nuclear imaging in urology

Prostate cancer: PSMA PET/CT could cut need for biopsies

A PSMA PET/CT imaging test could safely halve the number of people who need a biopsy for suspected prostate cancer following inconclusive or reassuring results from an MRI scan, new research finds.

Photo

News • Adherence to recommended treatments

Prostate cancer guidelines improve outcomes, study finds

From active monitoring to combinations of local and systemic treatment: A new study shows that most men with prostate cancer who receive treatment recommended by guidelines have a good prognosis.

Subscribe to Newsletter