Silver coins arranged on a table next to a stehoscope

© Cozine – stock.adobe.com

News • Sustainable Development Goals

Wealth = health? Not necessarily, study finds

Wealth alone doesn’t make a nation healthy, according to new collaborative research from the University of Surrey and its international partners which ranks 38 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries on their progress toward global health goals.

The study, published in Annals of Operations Research, shows that some of the world’s wealthiest nations, including the United States and Canada, lag behind smaller economies in achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3) – ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all. Meanwhile, countries such as Iceland, Japan and Norway lead the way, supported by robust health systems, equitable access to care. 

Using a new model co-developed by Surrey researchers, the study assessed how efficiently each country converts health investments into outcomes such as life expectancy, disease prevention and healthcare access. The results highlight that nations with well-integrated public health systems and preventative care achieve better outcomes for every pound spent, compared to those relying heavily on private healthcare.

Policymakers should prioritise on prevention, sustainability and equitable access over simply increasing health budgets

Ali Emrouznejad

Professor Ali Emrouznejad, co-author of the study and Professor and Chair in Business Analytics at the University of Surrey, said: “Money isn’t everything when it comes to national health. It’s how effectively countries use their resources that matters. Nations that prioritise prevention, universal access and social equity tend to outperform richer economies that focus more on spending than on strategy.” 

The team used a Joint Variable Selection Directional Distance Function model – an advanced data-driven method that measures how efficiently countries turn economic and health resources into well-being outcomes. This approach also incorporated for the impact of climate-related risks, revealing that countries with strong environmental health policies tend to consistently achieve higher overall health scores. 

The findings underscore the importance of building efficient, equitable healthcare systems that integrate climate resilience into their planning and delivery. Professor Emrouznejad added: “Policymakers should prioritise on prevention, sustainability and equitable access over simply increasing health budgets. Our model highlights which countries make the most of what they have, and which could learn from their approaches. It provides a practical roadmap for governments aiming to achieve sustainable, high-performing health systems without wasting resources.” 


Source: University of Surrey 

16.11.2025

Related articles

Photo

News • Health effects of global warming reach new heights

Climate change: The million-life, trillion-dollar health crisis

Climate change is claiming millions of lives every year, a new global report finds. The rate of heat-related casualties alone has climbed to 546,000 per year – more than one death every minute.

Photo

News • Research into socioeconomic factors

Why poor patients often have poorer surgical outcomes

Lower income, higher BMI, less time and fewer resources to improve their health: A new study links social and environmental factors in patients from deprived areas to poorer outcomes in surgery.

Photo

Klaus-Dieter Axt

Regaining strategic autonomy and competitiveness for MedTech

COCIR, the European Trade Association representing the medical imaging, radiotherapy, health ICT and electromedical industries, is announcing a leadership change as Secretary-General Annabel Seebohm…

Related products

Subscribe to Newsletter