Interview • Documentation assistance

Virtual scribes free up physician's time from eHR

Lisa Rotenstein, MD, of the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, is the lead author of a new study, “Virtual Scribes and Physician Time Spent on Electronic Health Records.”

Q: What question were you investigating?

portrait of Lisa Rotenstein
Lisa Rotenstein, MD

Image credit: Lisa Rotenstein, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Dr Rotenstein: “We sought to understand the impact of virtual scribes (human scribes who are not physically present in the exam room with the physician and patient) on how physicians spend their time and which characteristics are associated with physicians responding best to scribes.”

What methods or approach did you use?

“We studied the experiences of 144 physicians across specialties treating patients in the outpatient setting at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. We looked at physicians who had used a scribe for at least three months from January 2020 to September 2022. Since 2017, both hospitals have experimented with using real-time or asynchronous virtual scribe services.” 

What did you find?

“We found that use of virtual scribes was associated with physicians spending significantly less time in the electronic health record in total, on notes, and after-hours. Physicians with the following characteristics had the greatest reductions in electronic health records time upon scribe use: medical specialists, those physicians who started out spending the most time on their notes, and physicians who had the greatest reduction in how much they contributed to the note.” 

What are the implications and next steps? 

“These findings suggest that virtual scribes may be valuable tools for health systems looking to reduce the burden of the electronic health record for physicians. They also provide insight into which physicians may most benefit from virtual scribes, or in the future, AI-powered scribes.” 


Source: Mass General Brigham

26.05.2024

Related articles

Photo

News • Do no harm

“Never words” in doctor-patient communication (and what to say instead)

“There’s nothing else we can do”, “Why did you wait so long to come?” – doctors should avoid using such phrases. A new study points out the destructive potential of “never words”.

Photo

News • Double-edged sword

Remote medical interpreting might impede healthcare communication

Remote medical interpreting saw a huge boost during the Covid-19 pandemic – but despite its benefits, the technology could also have a negative impact on healthcare communication, experts argue.

Photo

News • Time loss vs. life expectancy gains

Dialysis: Is the tradeoff always worth it?

New research sheds light on the tradeoffs between survival and time spent in inpatient care that dialysis might entail. This could help patients with kidney failure make more informed decisions.

Related products

Subscribe to Newsletter