4 E H @ E C R Macros have been developed for every possible exam combination, to enable radiologists to incor- porate standard recommendations into their reports. Workloads are consolidated several times in a 24-hour day, so that expertise is always available. Flexible sched- uling is promoted for equitable work/life balance. Feedback and recommendations for improvement also have a schedule, with input from all involved carefully evaluat- ed. Changes are made for the good of the entire network. The workstation mouse: a help or a hindrance? Mouse efficiency matters. In a sin- gle shift, a mouse travels 1.37 miles with 10,778 total input actions, Shawn Lyo, MD, a neuroradiologist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, told RSNA attendees. ‘Choosing the right mouse and developing healthy usage habits can significantly enhance produc- tivity and reduce strain. Eighty- seven percent of radiologists report musculoskeletal discomfort in a weekly basis,’ he said. How to choose the right mouse? The decision is personal. Noting that shape impacts grip comfort, different shapes may work best for different sized hands. Weight is important, because lighter mice can improve speed. A heavier mouse can dampen unintended motions. Scrolling speed? Programmable buttons? ‘A mouse is a central com- ponent of a diagnostic workstation. How you optimize depends on your personal ergonomics, task demands, and computing environ- ment. Optimising your mouse isn’t a luxury. It’s a practical investment in comfort, speed, and longevity,’ said Dr. Lyo. Reducing radiologist’s interruptions Radiologists get interrupted. Daily interruptions may number in the hundreds in busy reading rooms of academic hospitals, caused by clinicians visiting the reading room to ask questions, by telephone calls, and by pagers, text mes- saging and urgent emails. ‘At one point, we recorded interruptions every three minutes,’ said Prof. Alexander J. Towbin, MD, a pae- diatric radiologist and Associate Chief Medical Information Officer at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio. Cincinnati Children’s radiology department was one of the first in the United States to create reading room assistant (RRA) positions. RRAs answer phone calls, answer general questions, communicate m o c . e b o d a - k c o t s – D t a w u n a P o J © critical results, and engage with reading room visitors and ‘direct traffic’. Radiologists enrol their profession- al private telephone numbers in a federal government registry to prevent scam and nuisance calls. Access to these telephone num- bers by hospital staff is severely restricted, forcing callers to direct inquiries to RRA. Phone ‘trees” are redesigned and improved for call- ers as needed, so that they expedi- tiously direct a caller to the person they ultimately needed to talk to. ‘We also evaluated workflow. RRA desks were relocated to the entrance of each reading room. With visitors having immediate access to RRAs when they enter a reading room, reading rooms have become quieter and less disruptive from a visual perspec- tive’. Stefanie Woodard, DO, a breast imager at the Heersink School of Medicine at the University of Alabama in Birmingham augment- ed Prof. Towbin’s remarks by dis- cussing the essentials of optimal reading room design. By Cynthia E. Keen Breast screening blind spot: Why transgender patients are falling through the cracks Transgender patients are large- ly invisible in breast cancer screening statistics – and many never receive an invitation to participate in screening pro- grammes. Guidelines exist, but awareness among referring phy- sicians remains low. Experts say radiology departments are best positioned to lead the change by creating inclusive environ- ments and actively reaching out to this underserved population. At the 2025 SBI Breast Imaging Symposium held in Colorado Springs, an expert outlined how imaging facilities can make a difference. Do transgender individuals need regular breast cancer screening? Yes, some do. How many trans- gender women and men have had a breast cancer screening examina- tion in the European Union? In the United Kingdom? In North America? What percent- age of transgender patients need annual screening, based on well-es- tablished guidelines? The answers are simple. Nobody knows. Even in countries with near ubiquitous electronic health records (EHR) at hospitals and clinics, statistics don’t exist. ‘This population is so under- served it is invisible,’ Prof. Avice O’Connell, MD, of the University of Rochester, US, and a radiologist affiliated with Strong Memorial Hospital and Highland Hospital, told attendees at the 2025 SBI Breast Imaging Symposium held in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The referral gap Transfeminine patients living in countries which have nation- al breast cancer screening pro- grammes may not receive invita- tions to participate because they are registered by their sex assigned at birth. Transmasculine individu- als who have genetic breast can- cer risk factors and/or cisgender female breast tissue, but who are correctly identified as transgender males in EHR data, may be also excluded from invitations to par- ticipate in a national breast cancer screening programme. It’s a somewhat similar situation in the United States, where physi- cians make the referrals for breast imaging exams. But based on anecdotal observation of the small numbers of transgender patients getting screened, it is question- able if the referring physicians do so. Data collection of mammograms performed on patients who identify themselves as transgender is not centralized and may not even be collected at imaging facilities where exams are being performed. In a world awash with data, information about breast cancer screening for and breast cancer developed by transgender patients is a series of not-even-guessable unknowns. Dr. O’Connell suggested that hos- pital radiology departments and freestanding imaging centres are best positioned to change this. But first they must change to attract transgender patients who may be turned off by entering a “women’s imaging centre” or by encountering clinical and support staff who do not know inclusionary language or comfortable interaction strategy. ‘If you use the wrong terminology, you will lose trust,’ she cautioned. ‘If patients feel comfortable, they will tell their friends who will start to come.’ Creating an inclusive environment Intake forms need to be gender neutral. Demographic data to be collected needs to include gender identity preference (male, female, or non-binary), as well as the sex assigned at birth. Patients should select the pronoun they relate to, and this preference should be used by radiology department staff. It is essential that imaging facilities project a welcoming, neutral envi- ronment rather than a convention- al feminine decor. This includes registration/check-in, colour of hospital gowns, changing areas, and screening and diagnostic wait- ing rooms. Signage in these areas needs to convey gender neutrality or inclusiveness. At least one clear- ly identified gender-neutral public restroom needs to be available. Patients who are transgender should be advised of breast cancer screening guidelines, regardless of the type of imaging exam they are having. Guidelines exist – but awareness is low Breast health and imaging experts from the American College of Radiology published ACR Appropriateness Criteria® (ACR) for Transgender Breast Cancer Screening in 2021.1 Guidelines with similar recommendations have also been published by a number of health organizations, including the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH),2 the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Center of Excellence for Transgender Health, the Endocrine Society, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. This is important because a recent study conducted by the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, of its primary care and internal med- icine physicians working at all Mayo Clinic locations, and those at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and the University of Texas - Medical Branch in Galveston, revealed that only 35% of the respondents were aware that breast cancer screening recommendations for transgender patients existed.3 Compounding this lack of aware- ness is concern by physicians about the accuracy and applicabili- ty of these guidelines because they reflect the best guess advice by experts, based on clinical analysis and studies of the data of cisgen- der women. Anna D’Angelo, MD, a consult- ant radiologist at the Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli in Rome, Italy, and a member of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) Young Club Committee, told AuntMinnie Europe in an interview, that the EUSOBI is plan- ning to launch a survey among its members to collect data about the Avice M. O’Connell, MD Avice M. O’Connell, MD, is pro- fessor of Imaging Sciences at the University of Rochester, New York, US. She is a breast screening expert with UR Medicine Breast Imaging. She received her medical degree from Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. With over 30 years of experience in breast imaging, she is actively involved in teaching and research, with a particu- lar focus on newer imaging modalities such as Cone-Beam Breast CT. transgender population to identify areas that need improvement.4. By Cynthia E. Keen References: 1. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Brown A, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, et al. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Transgender Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(11S):S502-S515. 2. Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, et al. “Standards of Care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, Version 8.” Int J Transgend Health; 2022;23(Suppl1):S1-S259. 3. Carroll EF, Woodard GA, St. Amand CM, et al. “Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients: A Knowledge and Familarity Assessment of Primary Care Practitioners.” J Community Health. 2023;48(5):889-897. 4. Rylands-Monk F. “Transgender breast emerges as a priority for radiology.” AuntMinnie Europe. October 20, 2025. EUROPEAN HOSPITAL Vol 35 Issue 01/26