8 E H @ E C R Physicians buy worse but more affordable devices Rads can become ‘centaur radiologists’ Technological change is a major part of change management in radiology and it is inevitable. Artificial intelligence (AI) has slipped into every area of life including the hospital, and is already making deci- sions in radiology systems. The good news is that radiologists could win on two fronts, provided they play their cards well, a leading USA radiologist told delegates at a recent congress in Spain. Frank Lexa, a professor of radiology at the University of Arizona and recog- nised speaker on medical leadership, believes there is no way to stop the waves of change brought by disrup- tive technology including AI, but radi- ologists can learn to surf. ‘AI already helps us with scheduling and with image display protocols. Stopping technologic change is not an option,’ he told delegates at the Triángulo Radiológico meeting, held in Valencia in January. Three types of technology have impacted on humans over the past hundred years. Incremental technol- ogy is an improvement of the existing technology and something of which radiologists are usually very fond. ‘It’s one of the reasons that I became a radiologist. Every year, things get better, CT scanners get faster, MR scanners have higher resolution and we obtain more information,’ Lexa explained. ‘But there is no change in customers and it doesn’t displace any other technology.’ Transformative technology, on the contrary, is where one technology replaces another due to quality, per- formance and/or cost advantages. The cassette player, for example, replaced the vinyl record, and later was replaced by digital music. In radiology, many technologies y h p a r g o l u c i r t n e V t s a r t n o C , y h p a r g o l a h p e c n E l a i x A . ) 2 6 9 1 ( . J , r e l l O : e c r u o S ( ) . 6 7 1 - 3 7 1 , ) 2 ( 9 1 , y r e g r u s o r u e N f o l a n r u o J , y h p a r g o l e y M d n a An axioencephalography chair and cassette holder have replaced others in the blink of an eye (5-10 years). The pneu- moencephalogram is something most radiologists have never heard of, yet it was all the rage just over 40 years ago. ‘It looks like somebody who is training to be an astronaut. In the US, CT almost immediately replaced the pneumoencephalogram. Some peo- ple used it for amusement through the holidays, but they were no longer using it for patients. In the space of a couple of years, it was completely replaced,’ Lexa pointed out. AI is part of disruptive technol- ogy, which, as first described by Clayton Christensen and Joseph Bower from Harvard University (Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave, Clayton Christensen and Joseph Bower, Harvard Business Review, 1995), consists of adopting an innovation that is lower cost and lower quality. ‘It’s often worse qual- Lexa predicted. ‘Anyone who doesn’t believe me, anybody who wants to take that bet, I’ll have dinner in Chicago with. Prepare for it!’ In spite of all the disruption, the traditional value that only the radiolo- gist does the consultation, supervises imaging, interprets and does form of management has not been broken up. However, with AI tools improv- ing at the speed of light, it’s unclear whether radiologists will keep on playing this role. It’s only natural that they feel threatened by AI. ‘I’m scared by AI as well. It does make me won- der sometimes what we’re training for,’ Lexa exclaimed. In the future, more and more machines that allow non-radiologists to do imaging will emerge, and also more machines that don’t need a technologist to be used. Machines that provide a preliminary read are already available. Computer systems that can extract information from imaging scans that human eyes and brains can’t easily see are also already available. Right now, in the USA, the most popular thing for residents is intervention, and part of this is the worry that it’s going to be easier for software algorithms to do most of the rest of diagnostic radiology. However, robots will also assist or perform interventional procedures. AI systems that can aggregate genomic imaging and clinical infor- mation are already available, and so are phone apps that will read a chest X-ray and AI systems that can do peer review for radiologists. ‘If you don’t like being reviewed by other humans, I don’t know how much you’re going to like being reviewed by a robot. This is not something that’s deep in the future. This is all happening now.’ The challenge for radiologists is how do they deal with these new sce- narios? First, they must face that issue. Pneumoencephalography procedure: a roentgenogram of the head after an intraspinous injection of air ity, but it changes the market and expands it. Disruption changes who the market is and how you work,’ Lexa explained. This happened to radiologists when imaging systems were devel- oped for non-radiologists. Many ultrasound machines created recently have worsened image quality, but made the technology more available to all medical specialists. ‘How many years did some people train, includ- ing myself, to learn how to use ultra- sound? Now, it’s like a stethoscope. Everyone who goes through medical training now thinks that they can do ultrasound; that’s a true disruption,’ he pointed out. Another example is the extremity MR system, which produces worse images than a traditional MR scanner launched 20 years ago. Physicians buy worse, but more affordable equipment. ‘You can put this any- where. You don’t need to block out the rest of the building; it’s cheap, and means you can pretty much have MR wherever you want.’ A lot of disruptive technology gets better after some time. This is hap- pening with ultrasound, small mobile CT scanners and, soon an MRI sys- tem, will fit in the back of a car, Coming: a fast throughput scanner to fit all sizes Disruptive innovations in molecular imaging Molecular imaging is an exciting field for scientists who are willing to explore and innovate, prominent Spanish physicist José María Benlloch pointed out when he reviewed some of the most impacting and recent innovations in his portfolio during a meeting in Valencia, Mélisande Rouger reports. ‘Our mission is to develop innovative sensitive and harmless medical imag- ing instruments for early detection of diseases and follow-up. We also work to create new minimally-invasive ther- apies based on physics mechanisms, and enable technology transfer to the industry,’ said Benlloch, Director of the Institute for Instrumentation in Molecular Imaging (I3M). Of late, Benlloch and team devel- oped the first PET scanner for pre- clinical evaluation of small animals – a technology they transferred to Bruker, and which Stanford University now uses. Another recent ground-breaking innovation is the PET/MRI scanner dedicated to brain examination devel- oped by I3M within the MINDVIEW (Multimodal Imaging of Neurological Disorders) European Project. The project aims to diagnose and treat schizophrenia, severe depres- sion, and all mental disorders. The new, high resolution PET/RF coil for simultaneous PET/MRI acqui- sition was originally designed for 7-T MRI, but soon upgraded to 9-T and 15-T at different sites across the world. Benlloch believes this has tremen- dous commercial potential. ‘There are about 40,000 MR scanners in the world, so the idea was simply to replace the radiofrequency device designed for brains to have an MR examination that also offers PET. Most MR examinations – perhaps over 40% – are for brain examination, so it makes sense to have such a solution,’ he pointed out. While working on the new machine, researchers found it must be adapted to accommodate a very large and het- erogeneous population of patients. For example, the elderly with Alzheimer’s may be challenging to image, due to age and condition. In addition, many improvements must be made, starting with compat- ibility of the newly developed sensors with MR. ‘These are silicon sensors that do not contain nickel, not to inter- fere with the magnetic field. Many of these sensors failed but images were obtained despite those errors. However, using appropriate software, the faults became almost undetect- able. We even managed to obtain resolution lower than 2mm, which posterior solutions were unable to achieve,’ Benlloch explained. A while ago, I3M also created the innovative PET mammograph and new molecular compounds for early breast cancer diagnosis and evaluation of chemotherapy response, as part of the EU Mammography with Molecular Imaging (MAMMI) project. The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, USA, installed the MAMMI Breast PET scan- ner for primary systemic neoadjuvant therapy, with excellent results. ‘We could clearly see tumour extension reduction and reduction of glucose uptake after the first chemotherapy cycle,’ Benlloch said. EUROPEAN HOSPITAL Vol 28 Issue 1/19 Left: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on a cellular scale: the picture shows an in vivo mouse brain with 29 µm resolution at 15.2 Tesla The MindView Project: Development of a high-resolution PET/RF coil, simultaneous PET/MRI acquisition for diagnosing mental disorders