1 4 M O N D AY @ M E D I C A Robotic-assisted visceral surgery The advantages are obvious dle holder, but inside the abdomen. This is brilliant.’ More ‘radicality’ A further advantage of robot-assist- ed surgery in oncology is immuno- fluorescence. These fluorescent dyes, injected by the anaesthetist, can stain the lymphoid tissue or other vessels and structures during surgery, either to protect them or remove them even more precisely with the respec- tive radicality. The prescribed number of lymph nodes to be removed for certain types of tumour surgery can be significantly increased with the da Vinci system. ‘During open surgery, the dyeing is very complex because there isn’t normally a camera system available, which is why it’s not usu- ally done. ‘For a long time, it was quite con- troversial whether tumour surgery should actually be carried out with the minimally invasive procedure at all,’ Krüger points out. ‘There was always the claim that it is not suf- ficiently radical. However, this has been scientifically refuted. It obvi- ously always depends on the exper- tise of the surgeon, but the proce- dure achieves at least the same, and sometimes even more radicality, and at the same time allows the patient to benefit from the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.’ Costs and viability Only a few patients in Germany cur- rently benefit from robotics in pan- creatic surgery. Last year, 43 surgical departments had access to one of the 87 systems currently available in that country. The number of depart- ments for visceral surgery and cen- tres that treat a noteworthy number of patients with robotics is consider- ably lower still; Krüger estimates it to be around 10-15 centres. This can most probably be attri- buted to the increased costs of the procedure, which are €1,000- €1,500 higher than the costs of conventional surgery and therefore still not always viable, despite short- er in-patient stays. The discussion as to whether these systems are really required, or not, is still very heated and affected by jealousy. On the other hand, there are currently almost exclusively only studies that confirm the feasibility, and only very few studies that confirm a clinical advantage of robotics compared to Editor-in-Chief: Brenda Marsh Art Director: Olaf Skrober Editorial team: Wolfgang Behrends, Lena Petzold, Marcel Rasch minimally invasive surgery. ‘However, this is to be expected at the moment, as we require a critical number of users and data to confirm clinical superiority. Method studies are dif- ficult to carry out anyway, and often only individual parameters are exam- ined. We don’t generally compare the minimally invasive procedure with robotics, so it is difficult to evaluate this,’ he explains. Krüger is establishing the first centre for robotic-assisted visceral surgery in Brandenburg, and plans to carry out his own studies. With gynaecological and urological col- leagues he aims to achieve full capa- city for the da Vinci-SI with around 500-600 interventions annually in one to two years’ time. Financial easing could occur from 2018/19 when large manufacturers will break the current monopoly held by Intuitive by releasing their own equipment, and when competition will regulate the prices for acquisi- tion and maintenance. Krüger is sure that ‘in five years’ time the costs will settle down around the level of those currently expected for a complex laparoscopy’. In April 2017, Dr Colin M Krüger MBA, Dipl.oec, became a senior consultant at the Department for Surgery at the Immanuel Hospital, Rüdersdorf, Germany, near Berlin since April 2017. Earlier, as a specialist for general, visceral and vascular surgery and emergency medicine at Vivantes GmbH, he also headed the visceral surgery programme for ‘Robot-assisted, minimally invasive Surgery (Da Vinci)’. From October 2016, he was senior consultant at the Centre for Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Department for Surgery, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Berlin. Krüger also holds a MBA in Health Economics, is a medical advisor at Intuitive Europe and is currently writing his habilitation at the University of Greifswald on the risk stratification in pancreatic surgery. Britain: Mark Nicholls. Malta: Moira Mizzi. Spain: Mélisande Rouger, Eduardo de la Sota. The Netherlands: Madeleine van de Wouw. USA: Cynthia E. Keen, i.t. Communications, Lisa Chamoff. Subscriptions Liane Kaiser, Theodor-Althoff-Str. 45, 45133 Essen, Germany Subscription rate 6 issues: 42 Euro, Single copy: 7 Euro. Send order and cheque to: European Hospital Subscription Dept Report: Brigitte Dinkloh The implementation of minimally invasive technology in the 1990s was a milestone for visceral surgery. A further chapter of innovation began about five years ago with advances in robotics, which were able to address certain technological shortcomings of minimally invasive surgery in the fields of optics, instrument technol- ogy and reconstruction. If nothing else, pancreatic surgery has benefitted from these develop- ments. ‘It ranks amongst the most complex interventions in abdominal surgery and opens up an impor- tant perspective to be able to offer these complicated and very time con- suming interventions, which have been carried out almost exclusively with conventional surgery, with an assistance system and minimal inva- sion,’ explains Colin M Krüger MD, Dipl.oec, Senior Consultant at the Department for Surgery, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, near Berlin. A lower rate of complications First studies and analyses confirm that the quality of organ removal and partial removal is more or less com- parable for both procedures, but also that the rate of complications asso- ciated with the intervention is sig- nificantly lower for minimally invasive procedures than for open surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery, whilst achieving the same surgical outcome, has clear advantages. But, which patients and indica- tions are suitable for robotic surgery? ‘Basically, all patients who are oper- able and fulfil the surgical entry cri- teria,’ Krüger responds. ‘If the diag- nosis confirms that a patient is likely to benefit from surgery, then this can also be done with minimally invasive procedures, or, in the best case, with robotic surgery, such as the da Vinci Surgical System.’ Krüger does not foresee a consid- erably better perspective for patients with pancreatic cancer as 70-80% of them are only diagnosed once the tumour has already spread and is considered inoperable. However, there are other pan- creatic diseases with a less negative prognosis, where surgical interven- tion is worthwhile. These include hormone producing tumours, as well as all types of chronic pancreatitis s a a M & x i r B © Colin Krüger is establishing the first centre for robotic-assisted, visceral surgery in Rüdersdorf, near Berlin such as those that may develop due to chronic alcohol abuse or as a result of autoimmune diseases, where the body tries to fight its own pancreatic tissue. The resulting inflammatory changes can cause jaundice, gastro- paresis and, most importantly, chron- ic pain. This is an area of application for robot-assisted surgery. Improved optics and a higher degree of freedom One essential advantage of the da Vinci Surgical System is the improved visibility over the operating area. ‘Unlike conventional laparoscopy, which only offers 2-D visualisation, it facilitates 3-D HD visualisation in the same way as open surgery does. The surgical structures can be enlarged up to tenfold, which means more precision during preparation,’ the Berlin-based surgeon emphases. The same applies to handling, with much more freedom when guiding the instruments in the abdo- men compared to conventional lapa- roscopic surgery. ‘The instruments have up to seven degrees of free- dom,’ Krüger points out. ‘When you work with double-joint technology the instruments carry out their own hand movements. This is the prin- ciple of the surgical robot – it con- trols the manipulators, and the hand movements carried out outside of the operating area are implemented 1:1 to the instrument working inside the abdomen. You sew externally, with the manipulator in your hands, and the robot sews with the needle, which you hold in the external nee- Medica’s Connected Health- care Forum Technological innovations are the drivers and ena- blers for new approaches that will revolutionise tomor- row’s medical world. Solutions for connected and mobile healthcare take part in these changes. Medica’s Connected Healthcare Forum and the correspond- ing exhibition area provide a platform for all those innovative products and systems that strengthen the networking of players, processes and systems within the healthcare sector. The forum takes place in hall 15 (Stand 15C24). The conference language is English. Focal Topics in 2017 include: Wearable Technologies in Sports & Healthcare Enabling Tech for Healthcare Devices Innovative Start-ups Pitching Their Medical Solutions Patient Centered IoT Solutions Connected Health Platforms Medical Mobile Solutions + 6th Medica App COMPETITION Healthcare Certification & Standards Disruptive Technologies in Healthcare Senior Writer: John Brosky Printed by: druckpartner, Essen, Germany Executive Director: Daniela Zimmermann Publication frequency: bi-monthly Founded by Heinz-Jürgen Witzke ISSN 0942-9085 Correspondents Austria: Michael Kraßnitzer, Christian Pruszinsky. China: Nat Whitney France: Jane MacDougall. Germany: Anja Behringer, Annette Bus, Walter Depner, Brigitte Dinkloh, Cornelia Wels-Maug, Holger Zorn. Great Representatives China & Hongkong: Gavin Hua, Sun China Media Co, Ltd. Phone: +86-0755-81 324 036 E-Mail: gavin_hua@163.com Germany, Austria, Switzerland: Ralf Mateblowski Phone: +49 6735 912 993, E-Mail: rm@european-hospital.com EH @ MEDICA No 1 2017