6 Overheard at AACC L A B O R AT O RY The complexities of drug testing in urine and hair Urine screening tests using only immunoassays are the most common procedures used to identify drug abuse. They are inexpensive, automated, and pro- duce rapid results. But they may produce false-positive or false- negative results, which vary based on the drug, drug class, and the assay used. Hair toxicol- ogy analysis is another form of drug testing, which unlike urine tests, enable analysis of drug use over a period of time. Hair tox- icology tests complement urine tests but can be just as challeng- ing to interpret. Mass spectrometry, specifically liq- uid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), is a powerful tool for toxicolo- gy analysis. Although more labour intensive, more time consuming, and much more expensive that hair and urine tests, LC-MS/MS is recommended for drug confirma- tion testing following a positive or inconclusive immunoassay screen. It is highly complex and requires significant expertise but provides definitive results due to its superior sensitivity and specificity. At the 2022 AACC Annual Scientific Meeting Joe M. El-Khoury, PhD, director of the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at Yale-New Haven Health, discussed the challenges of interpreting com- plex urine toxicology cases. in Chicago, ‘When in doubt, mass spec it out’ El-Khoury discussed a routine urine test ordered for a patient prescribed opioids and other med- ications for multiple, chronic, and complex medical problems. Her physician wanted to verify that this patient was not taking addi- tional types of painkillers. The test results were positive for heroine, but other findings were contradic- tory and confusing. ‘Immunoassay screening may not produce accu- rate results, because antibodies used in the assays for the targeted Publisher Mediengruppe Oberfranken – Fachverlage GmbH & Co. KG E.-C.-Baumann-Str. 5 95326 Kulmbach/Germany Phone +49 (0) 9221 949-311 Fax +49 (0) 9221 949-377 Editor and Production Manager: Sonja Buske (SB) Editorial team: Wolfgang Behrends (WB) Sascha Keutel (SKE) Senior Writer: Mark Nicholls (MN), Great Britain Mélisande Rouger (MR), Spain Managing Directors: Walter Schweinsberg, Bernd Müller m o c . k c o t S e b o d A – n o i t c u d o r P a i d e M k c o t S © drug may exhibit cross-reactivity toward other closely related com- pounds,’ said El-Khoury. ‘Patients maintained on chronic opioids are often at risk of false positives. The LC-MS/MS test determined that the patient was only taking exactly what she’d been prescribed. When in doubt, mass spec it out.’ He noted that patients taking Suboxone, a drug widely used for treatment of patients with opi- oid use disorder, are high-risk, and may attempt to stimulate compliance by spiking the pill in urine to pass the screening test. Immunoassays are not spe- cific enough to detect this sample adulteration and patients may get away with it. El-Khoury recom- mends that quantitative LC-MS/MS testing be the only method used for assessing adherence in patients taking Suboxone. When concentra- tions of drugs in urine are high, he advised the audience to make sure to rule out pharmaceutical impuri- ties, and to rule out enzyme inhi- bitors when metabolite patterns are unusual. Jacqueline Hubbard, PhD, the Laboratory Director of Three Rivers Diagnostics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, gave deeper insights into hair toxicology analysis. Hair grows an average of 1 cm each month. When hair samples are seg- mented into sections, it is possible to obtain a detailed historic profile of an individual’s drug exposure over a specified amount of time. However, the accuracy of the anal- ysis may be impacted by ultravi- olet light exposure and diffusion of sweat, which may occur at any time. Cosmetic hair treatments may strip analytes or increase environ- mental contamination. Melanin must be considered A person with higher melanin may show a greater accumulation of drugs compared to a person with low melanin, so this needs to be considered when testing dark hair. Hubbard explained that the Society of Hair Testing (SHT) recommends that hair first be segmented prior to decontamination. The Society re- commends use of aqueous washes and an organic solvent to remove oil and external contaminants from the hair. But these processes may still be insufficient. Recent research has suggested that such proce- dures may lead to the swelling of the hair and may promote incor- poration of analytes into the hair itself. Cleansed hair samples need to be cut, ground, and pulverized before they are analysed. ‘When drugs are detected in a panel, I recommend metabolite detection to confirm ingestion,’ she said. ‘The detected presence of drugs in hair may be due to ingestion, incidental exposure from contaminated sur- faces, impurities found in the drug, Founded by Heinz-Jürgen Witzke ISSN 0942-9085 Correspondents Austria: Michael Krassnitzer (MK) France: Jane MacDougall (JMD) Germany: Cornelia Wels-Maug (CWM) Karoline Laarmann (KL) Katrin Schreiter (KS) Dr Christina Czeschik (CC) The Netherlands: Madeleine van de Wouw (MvW) USA: Cynthia E. Keen (CEK) Subscriptions Simone Sesselmann kundenservice@mgo-fachverlage.de Subscription rate 4 issues: 32 Euro, Single copy: 8 Euro. Printed by: mgo360 GmbH & Co. KG, Bamberg, Germany Publication frequency: quarterly Representatives Germany, Austria, Switzerland: Ralf Mateblowski Phone: +49 6735 912 993 E-Mail: r.mateblowski@mgo-fachverlage.de France, Italy, Spain: Eric Jund Phone: +33 493 58 77 43 E-Mail: jund@european-hospital.com GB, Scandinavia, BeNeLux: Simon Kramer Phone: +31 180 6200 20 E-Mail: kramer@european-hospital.com Taiwan: Charles Yang Phone: +886 4 232 236 33 E-Mail: medianet@ms13.hinet.net USA & Canada: Hanna Politis, Media International Phone: +1 301 869 66 10 E-Mail: hanna@media-intl.com Maria Kaiser Phone: +1 250 726 4007 E-Mail: mkads@mac.com All company, brand and product names in this publication are the property of their respective holders. Users must obtain per- mission from those holders before copying or using the owner’s trademarks, product and company names or logos. and/or decomposition products of drugs.’ ‘Hair toxicology interpretation to determine the frequency of use and if a person used specific drugs is not that simple. The amount of drugs detected in hair may not be equivalent to the actual con- centration present in hair, and the relationship between the concen- tration in hair and the amount ingested is not well established,’ cautioned Hubbard. ‘Drugs in hair are indicative of repeated use and/ or exposure, and not of a single use or recent use. Hair as a matrix for toxicology testing has impli- cit biases, including seeing higher drug concentrations in pigmented toxicology analysis showed that the child had ingested two drugs, including methamphetamine. A two-year-old boy was admitted to a hospital emergency department with acute encephalopathy and seizures. His urine and lab tests were negative, but when the hair toxicology reports became availa- ble 30 days later, they had tested positive for exposure to oxycodone and methamphetamine ‘Hair toxi- cology helped identify an unstable home situation from drug use for both children. For the boy, whose parents were separated, it provided definitive evidence that the mother of the child was a drug abuser, enabling the child to stay with his m o c . k c o t S e b o d A – y l f y t t i k © father. These tests can be invalu- able in help keeping vulnerable children safe,’ she concluded. Report: Cynthia E. Keen versus non-pigmented hair after the same systemic exposure. This test frequently has a longer turn- around time compared to urine tests. But it may be useful to identify if children who have unex- plained conditions or may be expe- riencing developmental delays are living in unhealthy situations,’ she said. Hubbard described two cases that demonstrate the utility of hair toxicology testing. A malnourished two-year-old girl showing signs of neglect and developmental delays had a negative urine drug screen- ing test for 11 drugs. However, hair Jacqueline Hubbard Joe El-Khoury Jacqueline Hubbard, PhD, joined QualiTox Laboratories, now Three Rivers Diagnostics, in 2022 as its Laboratory Director. Her interests include toxicology interpretations, test utilization, and mass spectrometry. She also serves as an MSACL Practical Training scientific committee member and is actively involved in training new users on mass spectrometry. Her research has also focused on devel- oping and validating drugs of abuse assays, driving under the influence of marijuana, and Covid-19 serology research. Joe El-Khoury is Director of the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at Yale New Haven Health in New Haven, Connecticut, and Associate Professor of Laboratory Medicine at Yale University School of Medicine. A fellow of the AACC Academy, his research interests include indicators for monitoring clinical laboratory per- formance, investigating biomarkers of acute kidney injury and chronic kid- ney disease, and development of new mass spectrometry-based methods for the measurement of markers in bio- logical fluids. EUROPEAN HOSPITAL Vol 31 Issue 3/22