1 8 L A B O R AT O RY Vital vitamin D testing LC-MS outperforms immunoassays In recent years, clinicians have increasingly focused on vitamin D deficiency. Studies show that previous reference values – particularly for Vitamin D3 – were most probably set too high. Liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) can help achieve more precise measurements of vitamin D levels than previously established immunoassay procedures, explains Dr Torsten Binscheck-Domass, formerly a phar- macologist and toxicologist at the joint laboratory of the Charité and the Vivantes Group in Berlin, and an expert in clinical mass spectrometry at Thermo Fisher Scientific. However, in its current shape this com- plex technology is not suitable for all laboratories. Report: Daniela Zimmermann Although the relevance of the thresh- old values remains controversial, there is agreement on one point: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a range of clinical pictures, such as osteomalacia or respectively, rickets in children, as well as with increased susceptibility to infections. In the aged, a lack of vitamin D can also have severe consequences, as Binscheck-Domass explains: ‘Studies are currently being carried out to examine a correlation between vita- min D deficiency in older patients and osteoporosis as well as a reduc- tion in muscle strength, which leads to an increased risk of falls. For older patients, falls are complications that can have severe consequences, such as fractures, traumatic brain inju- ries and long-term hospitalisation, etcetera.’ UV-radiation from the sun is a nat- ural remedy, but is often not enough. ‘We recommend vitamin D screen- ing for people with little exposure to sunlight, particularly for vitamin D3,’ he adds. Basically, everyone whose face, hands, and ideally also lower arms, are exposed to the sun for at least 30 minutes twice a week should absorb sufficient vitamin D3 to also last them through longer periods without sunlight. However, deficiencies are documented for hos- pitalised patients, people in nursing homes and sometimes even for chil- dren and adolescents who spend lit- tle time outdoors. Vitamin D2, which is mainly absorbed via nutrition – such as edible mushrooms – plays a slightly less important role. LC-MS separates the wheat from the chaff One problem with measuring vita- min D levels in the body is that the different intermediate products are often very similar and cannot be dif- ferentiated correctly with antibody- based tests such as immunoassays. Together with the comparatively low concentration of calcitriol – the bio- logically active form – this often leads to measurement values that have little significance, the expert points out. LC-MS has a big advan- tage here as it can separate the bio- logically inactive epimers from the molecule of the vitamin. Therefore, LC-MS-based diagnosis achieves sig- nificantly higher specificity. Currently there are still hurdles which laboratories need to over- come when switching from immuno- assays to LC-MS, Binscheck-Domass explains; this centres less around the associated costs – the acquisi- tion requiring investments in the mid-six figure range, depending on the device – but rather the changes to the normal work flows: ‘These are complicated devices and you need trained staff who can not only oper- ate the equipment but also carry Torsten Binscheck-Domass MD is a Systems Lead Scientist in Clinical Mass Spectrometry at Thermo Fisher Scientific. Qualified in medicine, he is a medical and forensic expert consultant in analytical pharmacology and toxicology. He has more than 25 years of experience in the fields of therapeutic drug monitoring, drugs of abuse testing and systematic toxicological analysis. Dr Binscheck-Domass is a strong advocate of clinically applied LC-MS/MS and has been exploring the technology’s unique benefits to clinical labs for more than 10 years. out evaluations.’ Furthermore, some laboratories are deterred by regula- tory requirements because the quali- fication of the systems requires a lot of effort, with numerous calibration and test runs. Selection criteria for a laboratory information system Marry (a LIS) in haste, repent at leisure standard operating procedures (SOPs) they can visualise the spe- cific workflow of core processes to ensure relevant standards are met. Laboratorians should have easy access to quick visual overviews Buying a laboratory information system (LIS) means entering a long- term relationship with a software vendor. The selection criteria are many, but which, ask Markus Neumann, Harald Maier and Gabriele Egert, are just fashionable and which might be underestimated? donations, or for own blood dona- tions, are less well known. Generally, the trend is towards process monitoring. If a lab has The decision to buy a LIS – i.e. to form a relationship with one or more software vendors – is based on a slew of criteria, and excitement occurs over a long-term relationship. However, years pass before quality can be assessed. Hard economic, technical and functional criteria can easily be expressed in figures, whilst others are ‘soft’ and difficult to quan- tify; however, they should provide sound information to shape qual- ity in vendor/user cooperation. A purchasing decision results from balancing hard and soft factors. Specifications The basis of a specifications docu- ment to be provided to bidders for the tender is what’s required. If there is no in-house IT specialist, use of an IT consulting firm might be advisable. The checklist offers an initial overview of topics to be covered. Vendors invited to submit a quotation need careful selec- tion. Vendor criteria e.g. finan- cial position, years of continuous market activity and responsibility/ accountability. Visits to reference labs and infor- mation exchange with users can offer important insights. Beware: although criteria are important, they are no guarantee that soft- ware development will continue. Technical criteria Hard data concern software, hard- ware and database structure. Which operating systems, programming languages and web technologies will be used? How does the data- base perform under heavy work- load? An important question is user autonomy. Can you customise parameters, e.g. database queries? What training is included; what cost? Finally, physical interfaces support must be ascertained: Are popular interface protocols, e.g. HL7/IHE or ASTM, used and how are they practically integrated within the lab instruments? For vendors, programming customised device interfaces is a core busi- ness; over years this can amount to several thousand euros per ana- lyser – a significant position in the budget. Interfaces are also relevant in background processes, such as billing and controlling, or external communication with physicians to exchange order data and results. Functional criteria Every vendor offers many mod- ules listed in the table under ‘Functionality’. However, it makes sense to look at procedures and review their control by master data and parameters. Nowadays, many lab workflows must meet certain standards. Quality management standards, or ISO 15189, 17025, or even ISO 22870 for POCT, are pretty obvi- ous; others, such as GMP for blood Company Product Functionality Integration Results Feature Size, financial position Continuity, accountability/responsibility Reference customers Customer testimonials Soft skills Implementation concept Service Training Architecture Hardware Software Response time Maintenance contracts License policy Modules Data protection/privacy concept Tracking Compliance Master data management Order entry and capturing results Quality control Technical and medical validation Reading Billing Archiving Statistics Configurability Internal communication External communication hardware Existing data Costs Own contributions Costs over five-year period Continued on page 20 Checklist for a LIS selection Explanation Number of permanent and freelance staff, revenue, core business Type of company, year of incorporation, guarantees, ISO certification Number, size, scope, reputation Adherence to deadlines and delivery schedules, keeping promises, staff commitment, cooperation with instrument manufacturers Personality and competence of vendor’s staff during conversation Is it comprehensible? Volume, solution visualisation Hotline, response time, specialist availability Documents, online support, on-site training, seminars Client-server architecture, periphery, central master data server Central computer, PC network, terminals, printers, storage space, operating system Data base, data protection/privacy concept and confirmations, use of standard software, customisation of parameters (by user) Depending on database volume, number of web connections and online users (particularly in multi-site facilities) Type and scope, hardware, software, remote access Online devices, database, multiple installations (campus license), pay-per-use (instead of purchase) Clinical chemistry, microbiology, blood bank, pathology, billing, order entry, automation and control Permission-based, controlling access to patient data (e.g. lab values) Search and sort functions, order status and sample tracking RiLi-BÄK (in Germany), ISO 15189, ISO 17025, ISO 22870, GMP, etc. Data maintenance, parameters, copying, use of legacy data, across modules Keyboard, card reader, order entry, material ID, different bar codes, device interfaces RiLi-BÄK (Germany), Westgard, other quality systems, visualisation Auto-validation, rules, alarms, automated repeat measurements, visualisation Sort criteria for orders and lab, rules systems, ICD codes, footnotes in identical texts Multi-client capability, service portfolio, accrued accounts Procedure, duration, access, reactivation, archiving of image data Saved and spontaneous queries, SQL assistant, export to standard software Adaptation of software and user screens to the on-site situation Link to HIS and departments/wards, POCT devices, de-central printers, standard interfaces can be configured (HL7, Link to other hospitals, specialist physician labs, lab groups Use of existing printers, scanners, PC, receipt readers Use of legacy data, retaining identification logic Acquisition costs incl. commissioning, database, operating costs Which contributions are required (configuration, AP computer, preparation of hardware and server), These indicate whether a Europe-wide tender is required EUROPEAN HOSPITAL Vol 27 Issue 4/18